However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. No one shall mediate, induce, induce or coerce an unspecified person to engage in sexual intercourse or provide a place for sexual traffic in return for promising that he/she will give, receive or promise to give, or receive any money, valuables or other property benefits;

Nevertheless, from June 11, 2019 to July 11, 2019, the Defendant: (a) provided a smuggling located in the said business establishment, which was operated by the Defendant on the second floor of the building B located in the window B of Changwon-si; (b) provided a similar sexual intercourse in a manner that stimulates the sexual organ of the said customers, such as D (D, female, E, one life, F), G (G, leisure, H.H., one life, and one life, “I”), despite being aware of the fact that the manager of the relevant business establishment performs a similar sexual intercourse against customers; and (c) provided the said marina manager with a smuggling located in the said business establishment, in addition to the payment of the arm’s length from the general male customers in addition to the payment of the arm’s length, and led them to an act of sexual intercourse by stimulating the sexual organ of the said customers by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an act of providing a place for sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. No person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall employ any foreigner who has not obtained the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

Nevertheless, from the end of June 2019 to July 11, 2019, the Defendant employed a female as a marina on the condition that the Defendant would pay monthly salary of KRW 1,500,000 and KRW 5,000 per math on the condition that he would be paid monthly salary of KRW 1,50,000 per math and KRW 5,00 per math on the condition that the Defendant would not be entitled to engage in job-seeking activities by entering the Republic of Korea with the location described in paragraph (1), visa exemption (B-1) qualifications, and that he would not be entitled to engage in job-seeking activities.

As a result, the defendant employed a foreigner who did not obtain the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect to J;

1. Statement of each police statement related to D and G;

1. The statement of K;