If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On December 27, 2017, the Defendant called the victim C's cell phone with the Defendant and the victim who she she she she she shes with a match in a closed place with a new wall.

Nar, her, or her husband and wife, shall be abandoned.

L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.] The victim's cell phone called "I. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.W.

C. It shall be discarded by death.

In addition to sending the Kakao Stockholm message with the content of “,” sending the victim six times from that time to March 12, 2018, as indicated in the Schedule of Crimes, as shown in the Schedule of Crimes.

In other words, the victim was threatened.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph the contents of the Kakao Stockholm conversation CD, a photograph by cutting down text messages and cutting down the contents of the Kakao Stockholm conversation;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include all of the crimes of this case, the Defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case, repented and reflected his mistake, the Defendant did not have any record of punishment for the same kind of crime, the Defendant’s specific contents and frequency of the Kakao Stockholm message sent to the victim, including the Defendant’s age, environment, sexual conduct, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., and determine the punishment as ordered, taking into account all the sentencing factors indicated in the argument of this case.