beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2020.11.27 2020나47007

임대차보증금

Text

The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for partial dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Under the second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the defendant" shall be added to "the defendant".

In the first instance judgment, the first instance judgment No. 4-1)-2 through 3-2 of the first instance judgment, “Defendant C has the authority to act on behalf of Defendant B,” and “Defendant C is the actual owner of the instant store and the lessor, and Defendant B is the lessor and the lessor are the lessor and the lessor have leased the name.” The “Defendant C” in the fourth instance judgment No. 4-7 of the first instance judgment, “Defendant C” and “Defendant C” in the fourth instance judgment No. 4-1)-7 of the first instance judgment, “Defendant C is the lessor,” respectively, and “Defendant B” in the 8th instance judgment, “Defendant B is the lessor,” and “Defendant B” in the 5th instance judgment of the first instance.

The following shall be added at the end of the fifth page of the first instance judgment:

Around November 20, 2018, the Plaintiff argued to the effect that the trust relationship with respect to the instant lease agreement was broken due to the Defendant C’s failure to engage in a funeral at the instant store due to the lack of rent from around November 20, 2018. However, even if the Defendant C said the Plaintiff as above, it is insufficient to recognize that the trust relationship with respect to the instant lease agreement was broken, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise. The part of the “The instant lease agreement” in the first instance judgment from around 4 to 7, 2020 to the expiration of the lease term, and from around 200,000 to October 20, 2018, the lease agreement was terminated on August 20, 2018.