When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 02:40 on October 31, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was in the front of the revised public health clinic located in Sungnam-si, Busan-dong 2177, and was in the absence of the intent or ability to pay the taxi fee; (b) was in the D taxi of the victim C, and had the victim drive the said taxi before the new post office located in Sungnam-dong, Sungnam-dong, Sungnam-dong, which is the Defendant’s destination; and (c) obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 7,800 of the taxi fee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a taxi charge receipt;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In addition to the punishment imposed on March 28, 2012 on the grounds of the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defendant, on April 4, 2012, on the grounds of fraud, etc., two years of the suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for not less than ten months and two years of the suspended sentence of four months on April 4, 2013, he/she has been sentenced one time of the suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime as this case and several times of fines, and committed the crime of this case during the suspended sentence, but he/she committed the crime of this case during the period of the suspended sentence; however, the defendant was committed at the time of committing the crime and is divided, and the amount of damage