When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who is in an internal relationship with B other than the instant case, and B is in an associate relationship with C (V, 46 years of age).

I think, I tried to find the victim's business, and thought that the victim's business plaque.

1. On July 11, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 19:00, the Defendant: (b) at the Gunsando Do Do; and (c) “E” restaurant operated by the victim; (b) the address of the said B’s resident registration is the address of the victim’s residence; and (c) on the ground that B’s vehicles are parked in the vicinity of the victim’s house, the Defendant “B Chewing gue,

Along on about one hour, customers who were in the restaurant were able to take out of the restaurant, and customers who were outside the restaurant were unable to enter the restaurant, such as giving a large sound called "the year in which they were Chewing, the same year, and the year in which they were able to take care of."

2. On October 12, 2015, around 14:00, the Defendant: (a) died of and died in the Defendant on the ground that B did not enter the Defendant’s house at the place described in the foregoing paragraph (1) at around 14:00; (b) “The Defendant: (c) died of the Defendant, she was unable to draw up; (d) died of why he did not take any responsibility at the Defendant’s house; and (e) died of the Defendant.

Albaceba

Cpers are clearly responsible for each year, have customers who were in the restaurant get out of the restaurant, and no customers who were outside the restaurant are allowed to enter the restaurant by making a disturbance more than one hour, such as taking a bath with a large volume of sound.

3. The Defendant: (a) around 15:00 on March 8, 2016, on the ground that the victimized person was not subject to the Defendant’s telephone, the Defendant did not receive the Defendant’s telephone; (b)

Along on about one hour, such as the year in which this opening was unfolded, the year in which these weathers were raised, and the Hadow, the Hadow, “Is,” made the disturbance available to the customers who were in the restaurant, and made them out of the restaurant, and the customers who were outside the restaurant could not enter.

Accordingly, the defendant has a power over three times.