농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant: (a) prepared and sold agricultural and fishery products or products processed therefrom while running a restaurant in the name of “C” in Jeonnam-gun, Namnam-gun; (b) sold and supplied agricultural and fishery products or products processed therefrom on 54 occasions from March 2, 2014 to January 10, 2015; (c) had been located in 20-8, 5-gil, Yansan-gu, Jeonsan-gu, 54 times from January 2, 2014 to 54 times, but purchased a total of 59 km kimchi products manufactured from domestic distribution from domestic distribution to Chinese red powder, and provided customers with the names of 58 km rice stations and the number of remaining knifbs, and expressed it falsely in the indication of origin on the indication of origin as “domestic products”.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Three copies of the on-site photograph for evidence; and
1. Application of one copy of Acts and subordinate statutes to the specifications of supply of each distribution kimchi;
1. Article 15 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Articles 6 (2) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products for Criminal Facts and the Selection of Punishment;
1. A fine of one million won to be suspended for a sentence;
1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,00 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;
1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that there is no history of punishment for a crime, the fact that a franchise appears to have failed to obtain the amended original city display board from the head office as a franchise store owner without being aware of the provisions of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, and the fact that the head office complies with the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes);