A. Prosecutor 1) In light of the fact that L and E’s statement consistent with the facts charged in this part of the facts charged is reliable, while the first confession statement about the above L and E’s own crimes related to the hemp, it is difficult to believe in light of its contents, and the Defendant committed an act that was not fluent in the process of interpreting E’s police investigation, etc., the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment, even though the Defendant found L and E not guilty of this part of the facts charged, inasmuch as he sufficiently recognized that L and E interfered with the performance of official duties by making L and E make a false statement to the investigation agency by borrowing it, and thereby allowing L and E make a false confession. 2) The sentence (two years of suspended sentence for imprisonment with prison labor for six months) sentenced by the lower court is too un

B. The court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case in the absence of any claim for money as an attorney fee, which affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts and misunderstanding the facts. The court below erred in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. On January 15, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (mariju) and the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (A) received marijuana 4.89gg of the hemp, which had been in possession of “Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii, Ii.m., Ii, Ii, Ii.m., Ii, Ii, Ii.m., Ii.

B. The defendant of obstruction of performance of official duties is the Daegu Regional Police Agency.