2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

A. The plaintiff and C have three children on December 8, 1993.

B. The Defendant became aware of the business relationship with C, from June 2017, received and sent a legal Kakao Stockholm message in the relationship between C and C, “I want to do so because I want to do so because I want not know that I want to see it on the road,” and “I wish to do so. I do not live the same.”

C. Around August 2017, the Plaintiff became aware of the relationship between the Defendant and C, and frequently disputed with C, such as the conduct of marital fighting before his/her children, and on September 26, 2017, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit against the Defendant.

Nevertheless, until November 2017, the Defendant continued to communicate with C and brought about to Korea. On November 7, 2017, the Defendant was aware of the Plaintiff as well as C.

[Ground] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, 10, 21 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Even if the judgment is made by the third party, it shall not interfere with the common life of the married couple falling under the essence of the marriage by interfering with the other party's common life by causing a failure of the married couple's common life, and the third party's unlawful act with the either side of the married couple, thereby infringing on or interfering with the common life of the married couple falling under the essence of the marriage and causing mental pain to the spouse by infringing on the right as the spouse

(2) In light of the above facts, the Defendant, despite being aware of the existence of a spouse C, maintained an inappropriate relationship with C for a considerable period of time, and maintained the relationship despite the Plaintiff’s demand for discontinuance, which became aware of the existence of a spouse. The Defendant’s aforementioned act is the right to the Plaintiff’s community life, which is the spouse of C.