beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.04.08 2014나9681

손해배상

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 593,400 against the Plaintiff and its related thereto are from July 13, 2013 to April 8, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 13, 2013, the Defendant: (a) on the 13th floor of the D apartment 1310 dong 1, 1310, and on the 1st floor in Kimhae-si on July 13, 2013, the Defendant was unable to discover the Plaintiff who was coming to the string to board the elevator; (b) did not discover the Plaintiff who was coming to the string to the string; and (c) took part in the Plaintiff’s left string to the left string; and

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

On November 25, 2013, the Defendant was indicted for summary facts in the instant accident and was issued a summary order of KRW 500,000 (Seoul District Court Decision 2013 Gowon District Court Decision 2013 Gowon District Court Decision 8791). Accordingly, the Defendant requested formal trial and was sentenced to a stay of sentence of fine of KRW 50,000 on March 18, 2014 (Seoul District Court Decision 2013 Gowon High Court Decision 1615). The above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 4 and 6 (including branch numbers, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above fact of recognition of damages liability, the defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case.

3. Scope of liability for damages

A. The Plaintiff, as a beauty artist, was receiving KRW 2,50,000 per month in the beauty art room, was involved in the instant accident. The Plaintiff was bound to have a beauty art room which mainly attended due to the characteristics of the beauty art business, which mainly took the part in the injury, and was unable to engage in income activities for one month after the instant accident, and claimed monthly salary for one month. However, it is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff lost the Plaintiff’s labor ability during the said period, and that the Plaintiff was working in the beauty art room upon receiving KRW 2,50,00,000 per month, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

Rather, the fact of this court's fact-finding on the E Hospital Head.