게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
Around August 24, 2009, the Defendant proposed a “bridge” under the name of D, E, and the Defendant’s “F” to “F, the person who is the person who was engaged in the work of D in the instant restaurant located in the Orcheon-gu, Orcheon-gu, Orcheon-gu, Busan, by suggesting that the F gave its consent. Around August 25, 2009, the Defendant leased the second floor of the building located in Orcheon-gu, Orcheon-gu, Orcheon-gu under the name of F. Around August 28, 2009, and applied for the registration of an Internet computer game facility operator under the name of F in the office of Orcheon-gu, Orcheon-gu, Busan, 129.
Accordingly, the Defendant, along with D and E, conspiredd to operate the above scamba, with the head of the above scamba, H, I, J, and K as an employee, to operate the scamba in the following manner:
No game products related business entity shall engage in gambling or other speculative acts using game products or exchange or arrange for exchange the results obtained through the use of game products.
Nevertheless, from September 2, 2009 to September 8, 2009, the Defendant sold 10,000 won, 30,000 won, 50,000 won, which is capable of receiving money from customers, to charge for the game money, and the customers may receive the money from the said exchange account by means of money transfer to the said exchange site, such as the entry of the film coophone number into the above game money and filling the game money. When the customers are going to play the games, they automatically fall from drinking, and the winning points are accumulated and accumulated according to the examples such as the original dic, dic, etc., and the winning points are demanded by the customers to exchange the points obtained from the “water dicine dicine” game with the “water dicine dicine” game with the automatic function and example function.
Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with D, E, and H, had customers who found the above game site perform the above speculative act.