However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 00:35, August 16, 2014, at the criminal room of the same police station located with the name of Busan Dong-gu, Busan, the Defendant: (a) caused disturbance that the taxi engineer B, who was a guest, francing the narcotics, francing the narcotics; and (b) requested a search and seizure warrant to return to the Defendant after explaining that C in the circumstances where C belonging to the above police station could not conduct the narcotics test without the search and seizure warrant; and (c) requested the Defendant to return to the Republic of Korea, the Defendant “I will not go off. I need to go off. I will go off the clothes. I will go off.” At the end, I pushed the chest of the above C in his hand, and assaulted the face of the above C by drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of the lives and bodies of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police statement protocol statute to B and C

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] Article 62-2 of the Act on the Performance of Official Duties, consideration of the fact that no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) (no person who has been sentenced] has any history of the same crime (decision of sentence], that there is no history of the same crime, that there is an agreement with C, who is the other party to the