손해배상(자)
1. Defendant’s plaque, which exceeds the money ordered to be paid under the following among the part claimed by the Plaintiff in the judgment of the first instance.
1. The court's explanation concerning this case is set forth in Article 3-B of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.
The following 2-A of paragraphs (the part of the post-treatment cost).
The reason for the judgment of the court of first instance is set forth in paragraph 3-D.
subsections (part of property damage after limitation of liability) 2-B.
The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of each claim other than each other, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Parts to be dried;
A. Subsequent to the lapse of 15 years from February 31, 2012, the Plaintiff’s future treatment costs required for KRW 1,453,876, the Plaintiff needs to undergo anti-scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics required for KRW 8,00,000 every seven years from July 30, 2028, which was sought by the Plaintiff.
(B) In light of the above, the Plaintiff’s physical examination of the head of the first instance court, 11,538,276 won, which is the day following the date of the closing of argument in the trial, is deemed to have been carried out on September 30, 2016. In addition, according to the result of the physical examination of the head of the Seoul Women’s Hospital, the Plaintiff’s physical examination of the head of the Seoul Women’s Hospital at the first instance court, which is the date of physical examination, needs to be friendly treatment for two years from January 10, 2014, and the Plaintiff’s medical treatment cost of KRW 1,773,90, mental treatment and re-medical treatment cost of KRW 4,222,296, examination cost of KRW 5,542,080, which is expected to be spent on September 30, 2016.