명예훼손
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows: (a) around August 18, 2014, the Defendant damaged the honor of the victim E by pointing out false facts, stating that “E has been suffering from less than a mentality,” and “E has been suffering from less than a fine,” around August 19, 2014, at the same place where F, etc. is located in the above senior citizens’ office, around August 19, 2014.”
This constitutes Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act and Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the express will of the victim under Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act. According to the written agreement, it is recognized that the victim expressed his/her intention not to punish the victim on May 7, 2015, which is after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 (6