A. The defendant asserts that the judgment of the court below that the defendant, although the victim's her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

B. The Defendant asserts that the sentence imposed by the lower court (a fine of four million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. At around 23:55 on May 2, 2014, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim, on the road near the “D” located in Gosung-gun C, following the victim E (n, 20 years of age), with the victim’s left knife hand, and with the victim’s knife hand, committed an indecent act.

B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged by compiling the evidence as indicated in its judgment.

C. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., ① the victim made a concrete and consistent statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, and ② the police officer F who called to the scene stated in the court of the court below that “the defendant asked the defendant about the circumstances of the case, and the defendant said that “the victim’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake is not accepted.

3. The defendant's judgment on the assertion of unfair sentencing is recognized as having no record of punishment except for the punishment of a fine of KRW 100,000 for the violation of the Establishment of Homeland Reserve Forces Act in 193.

However, the defendant appears to have suffered considerable mental impulse due to the crime of this case.