교부금 반환처분 등 취소 청구
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
3. On June 1, 2016, the Defendant against the Plaintiff.
The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as follows: "E shall be deemed to have been paid even in January 2015, 2015 according to the evidence No. 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance," with the exception of adding "E shall be deemed to have retired on January 1, 2015," and "(the defendant shall be deemed to have retired on January 1, 2015," and the part of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be cited as it is in accordance with the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case where "E shall be deemed to have been retired on January 1, 2015," as alleged by the plaintiff.
Thus, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and according to the data shown in the records of this case, it is recognized that the execution of each disposition of this case of this case is urgently needed to prevent damage which can be caused to the plaintiff, and there is no other data that can be recognized that the suspension of execution may seriously affect public welfare. Thus, the execution of each disposition of this case shall be suspended ex officio until the judgment of this case becomes final and conclusive, and it is so decided