Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

A. Relevant Defendant is a local organization of a corporate association D, and a corporate association B C center for senior citizens (hereinafter “instant center for senior citizens”) is a group under the Defendant’s jurisdiction, and the Plaintiff is a member of the instant center for senior citizens.

B. On March 12, 2019 and March 19, 2019, the term of office of the Chairperson E of the instant center for senior citizens expires on December 6, 2018, and after the end of the term of office of the Chairperson E of the instant center for senior citizens, F was elected as the Speaker pro tempore on March 12, 2019 by a written resolution of the majority of the members of the center for senior citizens. 2) On March 12, 2019, the Speaker pro tempore F of the instant center for senior citizens determined and publicly announced the date and time of the election of the Chairperson of the instant center for senior citizens as the C center for senior citizens on March 19, 2019 and the place as C center for senior citizens.

(3) On March 14, 2019, the Defendant sent an official document requesting the suspension of the president’s election procedure on March 19, 2019, on the following grounds: (a) the instant public notice publicly announced by the Speaker pro tempore F, who was elected at an extraordinary general meeting that did not go through legitimate procedures to the Plaintiff; (b) the Defendant sent the official document requesting the suspension of the president’s election procedure. (c) On March 19, 2019, the head of the Defendant visited the instant senior citizens center and explained on March 19, 201 that the election of the president, who intends to work on the day, would be in violation of Article 20 of

5) Notwithstanding the Defendant’s written public notice to suspend the election of the president and the Defendant’s public notice above, the center for senior citizens of this case was held on March 19, 2019 in accordance with the instant public notice, and the Plaintiff was elected as the president on the sole basis of 20 members present. (C) The Defendant’s report on the improvement of the senior citizens of this case was submitted to the Defendant to the effect that the head of the center for senior citizens of this case would improve the senior citizens as the Plaintiff. On March 21, 2019, the Defendant rejected the Plaintiff’s application for registration of the president of the center for senior citizens of this case on the ground that “the procedural defect in convening the meeting for senior citizens and the voting of those who are not the regular members in the election

Disciplinary action against the plaintiff.