However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On May 12, 2014, at around 00:55, the Defendant: (a) arrested the victim F as a flagrant offender at the main point of “E” in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, as a crime of assaulting the victim F at around 01:10 on the same day; (b) was a fine as a violation of the Road Traffic Act; (c) forged a letter of confirmation related to the arrest of flagrant offender by stating “G” in the form of confirmation seal of the document related to the arrest of flagrant offender without authority for the purpose of exercising his/her personal information; and (d) submitted it to the chief of the police station affiliated with the above police station, who is aware of such fact, as seen above, as if the document was duly established with the signature of the forged G, thereby exercising it.

2. At around 03:20 on the same day, the Defendant was under investigation by the police station in the Ulsannam Police Station and the criminal two teams of the Criminal Team in the interrogation of the above assault case by G while being examined by the police officer I, and without authority, forged the signature of G’s name by stating “G” in the column of the statement of the suspect interrogation protocol without authority for the purpose of exercising the right, and then presented it to I who is unaware of the fact that the signature of the forged G was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The first protocol of examination of the accused (No. 5 No. 1);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of written confirmation;

1. Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of private signature) and Article 239 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The dismissed portion of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., confession and reflectiveness, and the fact that the Article Article 62(1) was immediately discovered, and other factors such as circumstances leading to the crime and the family relationship of the defendant

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, at around 00:30 on May 12, 2014, drinked together with his day-to- day-day alcohol with his day-to-day alcohol at the main point of “E” located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu.