공사대금
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 50,248,702 against the Plaintiff and its related thereto, from September 24, 2013 to June 4, 2015 to the Plaintiff.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the part (which is a judgment on part of the defendant's defense of set-off) in the third to fifth to fifth to the judgment of the court of the first instance, the following is the same as the written judgment of the court of the first instance. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The defendant asserts that the defendant bears the obligation of 3,46,764 won for repair of defective defects (1). (2) According to the appraiser D's appraisal regarding the construction of this case, 61,927 won for repairing the second floor, 261,36 won for repairing the second floor, 265,733 won for repairing the wall of the second floor, 265,733 won for repairing the second floor, and 1,501,873 won for repairing the defective water, and 1,573 won for repairing the second floor, 250 won for repairing the defect (2.35 won for repairing the second floor, 365,75,895 won for repairing the second floor, 365 won for repairing the defect (2.5 won for repairing the second floor, 365 won for repairing the defect). The plaintiff's claim that the defendant should bear the obligation of 1965 won for repairing the second floor, 3615 won for repairing the two-years.