beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.04.09 2019고단6369

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 27, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court, and completed the enforcement of the sentence at the Incheon Detention House on March 12, 2018. On April 4, 2018, the Incheon District Court sentenced two months of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon Detention House on May 12, 2018.

"2019 Highest 6369"

1. On September 6, 2019, the Defendant ordered food and alcohol to the victim as if the victim C operated by the victim C in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, would normally pay the food cost.

However, the defendant did not have any special property or income, and there was no money or means of payment, so even if he received food and drink from the victim, there was no intention or ability to pay the price.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was issued to roasting, roasting, and lodging the amount of 12,00 won at the market price from the victim.

2. The Defendant interfered with business, on the ground that he was able to have the Defendant, who was divingd under the influence of alcohol at the time, at the time, at the place specified in the above 1.A., she obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by making it impossible for the Defendant to enter the said restaurant due to the influence of about 30 minutes, by making it impossible for the customers who had entered the said restaurant, to have a disturbance, such as “Cred. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Had. Ba.”

"2019 Highest 8903"

1. On September 14, 2019, around 13:20 on September 14, 2019, the Defendant ordered food and drink to the victim as if the Defendant would normally pay the cost of food to the “G” restaurant operated by the Victim F in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any special property or income, and there was no money or means of payment, so even if he received food and beverage from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the price.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim, and is in total the market value from the victim.