The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, as alleged in the grounds of appeal, by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the employer of the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits, the intention to pay retirement allowances, and the grounds for exclusion from liability.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.