When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 10, 2019, from around 03:50 to 04:20 on the same day, the Defendant was able to avoid disturbance, such as franchising at the Sungnam Police Station Sungnam Police Station located in 190-6, in terms of the mountain nature of Sungnam-gu, Sungnam Police Station, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, and 03:23 on the same day, and 03:23 on the same day, the Defendant raised complaints against taxi drivers and police officers located in the same area, and sprinking against the police officers at the same place, and sprinking “sp and sprinking measures are not to be taken against the wrong person.” On the other hand, the Defendant did not have made a disturbance, such as humpinging the humbr.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, had a very rough and disorderly speech or behavior at a public office in the public office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Application of C’s written laws and regulations

1. Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and the selection of fines concerning the crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.