부당이득금반환 등
1. The part against the Defendants in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked, and the Plaintiff’s lawsuit as to the revocation portion shall be dismissed.
2...
1. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) AE Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “AE”).
(2) On May 1, 200, the Plaintiff did not have any title to seek compensation for resettlement against the Plaintiff while carrying out the housing reconstruction project in the Seocheon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City AF zone around 2000, and there is no title to seek compensation for resettlement against the Plaintiff. As such, the Incheon District Court’s Busan District Court’s Seoul Special District Court’s 2001Gahap1910 (hereinafter referred to as “the lawsuit claiming compensation for relocation”).
at the time of the plaintiff, AG, the president of the board of directors, paid KRW 1,860,946,00 to AE.
“Although the Plaintiff should have raised an objection to the compulsory adjustment decision, the said decision became final and conclusive because it did not raise an objection. Accordingly, the Plaintiff incurred damages equivalent to the same amount by paying KRW 1,860,946,00 to AE around 204, which was referred to as “the instant breach of trust.”
(2) At the time, AE offered a public invitation to commit the instant breach of trust (hereinafter “E”) and around May 2006, AE changed its name from the Korea National Housing Corporation (current, the name was changed to the Korea National Housing Corporation; hereinafter “Korea National Housing Corporation”) which is the implementer of the relevant housing development project in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “Korea National Housing Corporation”) to the Plaintiff and owned by the Plaintiff, the Seocheon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City AH large 2,638 square meters, and the AI 68 square meters (hereinafter “each land of this case”).
(3) The Plaintiff received compensation KRW 250,882,060 from AE without any title. Accordingly, the Plaintiff has a total of KRW 2,111,828,060 (liability 1,860,946,00 for the return of unjust enrichment of KRW 250,882,00) against AE. Meanwhile, AE has a loan claim of KRW 11 billion against Pyeongju Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Pyeongju Development”), Pyeongtaek Development has a right to claim ownership transfer registration for each land indicated in the separate sheet against D, and D et al. has a right to claim ownership transfer registration and provisional registration for each land indicated in the separate sheet against the Defendants.