2. Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final;

On July 2, 2016, at around 02:30, the Defendant driven a nived-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, report on the results of regulating the driving of drinking, report on the circumstances of the driver of drinking alcohol, report on the actual condition, and inspection report on the vehicle register;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including that the defendant was punished twice due to the crime of drinking, and that there was a majority of criminal charges, but also the driving of drinking alcohol. This is an unfavorable circumstance to the defendant.

The Defendant led to confession and reflect on the crime of this case.

There is no criminal history over fines against the defendant.

This is the circumstances favorable to the defendant.

In addition, in consideration of all the circumstances shown in the arguments and records of the case, such as the age, sex, environment, and circumstances after the crime, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.