A. The sentence of the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The following determination is an unfavorable circumstance to the Defendant.

The crime of this case is not likely to be a crime because the defendant committed an assault without any justifiable reason against the police officer dispatched after receiving a false report.

The Defendant was punished at least 20 times for violent crimes, such as interference with the performance of official duties, interference with duties, and assault.

In particular, the crime of this case was committed not only during the period of repeated crime but also during the period of repeated crime.

On the other hand, the following conditions are favorable.

Defendant’s crime of this case is against the crime of this case and does not repeat it.

There are many things.

The degree of violence is relatively minor.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances following the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, etc., and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or is not deemed unfair, and thus, the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s assertion are without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.