However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. In a case where: (a) on November 5, 2015, the Defendant: (b) reported a 112 taxi engineer’s 112 report that he was sent to the scene, the victim D, a police box of the Bupyeong-gu Police Station C, sent to the scene, requested the Defendant to get off from the taxi; (c) on the part of the victim, the said taxi engineer and seven residents living in the surrounding areas, the victim, who was on the part of the police box of the Seocheon-gu Police Station C, who was sent to the scene, was on the way before the 75th day of the Gocheon-gu, Orcheon-si; and (d) whether he would get off from the taxi.

In addition, the victim publicly insultingd the victim by speaking as “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.”

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, requested the Defendant to leave the police box attached to the Yacheon Police Station C to the Defendant at the taxi. As he can be frighted, the Defendant frightch, fright, fright, frighted, frighted, frighted, frighted, frighted

R. A. L.I.D. L. L.I.D.

“Intimidating” the term “.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Protocols of examination of witnesses E in the Republic of Korea;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D;

1. F’s statement protocol on the police with regard to F [The Defendant and the defense counsel]: (a) there was no desire for a police officer or interference with the performance of official duties; and (b) even if such fact was found, suffering from the climatic dependence on alcohol use, and was in the state of drinking at the time; and (c) such physical and mental loss or mental weakness was not sufficient enough

The argument is asserted.

According to each of the above evidence, the defendant's desire to make the victim D and as such, it can be sufficiently acknowledged that the defendant made intimidation as he would be able to do so. Thus, the above argument 1 is not accepted.

Next, the defendant is in a state of mental disorder due to alcohol use and emotional unstable character disorder.