If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Since it is judged that there is no substantial disadvantage in the exercise of the defendant's right to defend, the facts charged are organized as follows without any changes in indictment.

On June 23, 2013, the Defendant sold tobacco, which is a drug harmful to juveniles, to juvenile E (the age of 16) at the store around 17:00 on June 23, 2013, in the name of "D". The Defendant sold tobacco, which is a drug harmful to juveniles, to 2,700 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement to the effect that tobacco was sold to E;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Article 59 of the Juvenile Protection Act and Articles 59 subparagraph 6 and 28 (1) of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserts that since the defendant confirmed his identification card of E before one week prior to the occurrence of the instant case and confirmed that E is an adult, selling tobacco without conducting a new identification card at the time of the instant occurrence, and the defendant did not recognize that E was a juvenile.

그러나 E는 피고인에게 신분증 등 나이를 증명하는 서류를 보여준 사실이 없다고 일관되게 진술하고 있는 점, E가 허위 진술을 할 특별한 이유가 없는 것으로 보이는 점 등의 사정에 비추어 보면 E의 진술을 믿을 수 있다고 할 것이고, 한편 E는 ‘다시 갔을 때 피고인이 신분증을 보여 달라고 하였으나, 전에도 와서 담배를 샀었다고 말하자 신분증을 확인하지 않고 담배를 판매하였다‘는 취지로 진술하고 있는바, E의 연령, 외모 등에 비추어 볼 때 피고인은 미필적으로라도 청소년에게 담배를 판매한다는 인식이 있었을 것으로 보이므로, 공소사실은 그 증명이 있다고 할 것이어서...