대여금
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B’s KRW 500,000,000 and for this, KRW 9% per annum from June 7, 2013 to April 1, 2014.
1. Determination as to the cause of the claim Gap evidence 1-1-3, Gap evidence 2-1 (a cash loan certificate and appraiser D's fingerprints show that the following machines are the above people, and the authenticity of the entire document is presumed to be established, and two (a loan certificate and appraiser D's fingerprints show that the following machines are the above people, and the authenticity of the document is presumed to be established, in light of Gap evidence 3, Gap evidence 4-1, and 2's oral arguments, the interest rate of 9% per annum, and interest rate of 00 won per annum and 00 won per annum from the plaintiff's heir's heir's heir's debt 00,000 won x 60,000 won from each of the above facts that the defendants were not entitled to the above 00,000 won per annum and 00,000 won from the deceased's heir's debt x 60,000 won per annum and 60,000 won from each of the above facts.
2. Judgment on the defendants' assertion
A. (i) The Defendants renounced the inheritance of the deceased E, and Defendant C renounced the inheritance of the deceased F, and Defendant B admitted the inheritance of the deceased F. As such, the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant C in the instant claim is without merit, and Defendant B’s claim against Defendant B is justified only within the scope of the deceased F’s inherited property.