However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person engaging in driving a bus B.

On March 31, 2014, at around 10:15, the Defendant started the bus on the road in front of the separated father and the head of the Dong-gun, Macheon-gun, Macheon-gun, Macheon-do.

The location is a bus stop, which has started after stopping to get passengers to get off, there was a duty of care to prevent the fall of the bus by checking whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is fully passengers or not, and by safely starting the door after the regular close of the door.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not confirm whether all passengers were deprived of it, and caused the victim C (the 71-year-old age) who was unable to get out of the bus in front of the open door, to go beyond the road.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, which requires approximately 10 weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as seen above, by the “alley between the opposite party and the opposite party.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police with respect to C and D;

1. Statement on the occurrence of traffic accident;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A traffic accident occurrence report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Photographs explanation;

1. Application of CCTV image file Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) and Article 3 (1) 10 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the fact that the victim and the bus operated by the defendant are admitted