A. The plaintiff is a child of D, and the defendant holds a claim against D.

B. On February 17, 2012 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, a notary public of February 17, 2012, under Article 435 of C 2012, “The Defendant lent KRW 40 million to the Plaintiff on July 14, 2011, and the Plaintiff borrowed it. The Plaintiff decided to repay the principal in full on March 14, 2012. The Plaintiff, as of February 17, 2012, signed a notarial deed of monetary loan agreement (No. 4; hereinafter “notarial deed of this case”) stating that “The Plaintiff transferred the ownership of KRW 90,500,000 to the Defendant by the method of possession of possession, and the Defendant acquired it by the obligee,” which is, the notarial deed of monetary loan for transfer (No. 4; hereinafter “No. 1”).

C. At the time of the preparation of the notarial deed No. 1, D representing the Plaintiff, and D had the power of representation in the name of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff’s seal imprint, and the Plaintiff’s certificate of personal seal impression issued by proxy.

On the other hand, the Plaintiff’s resident registration number is “G”, and the “related person indication” column of the No. 1 No. 1 notarial deed of this case stated that the Plaintiff’s resident registration number was erroneously stated as “H”, and that the attorney-at-law in charge of authentication in charge of authentication was written on February 7

E. On July 26, 2019, in the process of filing an application for grant of execution clause based on the No. 1 notarial deed with the law firm C on July 26, 2019, there is a defect that the Plaintiff’s resident registration number stated in the No. 1 notarial deed of this case was erroneously stated with the employee of the law firm C, and the employee of the law firm C replaced the part of the “related person’s indication” stated in the No. 1 notarial deed of this case with the Plaintiff’s resident registration number accurately stated, and the attorney-at-law first prepared on February 7,