When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 19, 2018, the Defendant 22:48 at the F cafeteria operated in Seosan-si D, Seosan-si, 2018, “two persons are wrapping.”

- The phrase “I am asked from the police officers and three other officers belonging to the G District of the Seosan Police Station who received the 112 report to leave the above restaurant,” and “I am why I am why I am ar, I am ar, I am ar, I am ar, I am ar, I am am ar, I am ar, I am am ar,” and “I am mar, I am ar, I am ar, I am ar.”

h. Before why they were the case in I.

“......... “ by hand, he was pushed down the instant H’s timber with his own hand.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to confirm facts by J;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although there are many criminal records of the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, it has been 10 years prior to the lapse of 10 years, and the defendant's mistake is recognized.