The punishment of the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The circumstances favorable to the defendant are recognized, such as the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim during investigation.

However, the Defendant had been sentenced to about 20 times of punishment including one time of suspended sentence due to violent crimes, and was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment with labor and 2 years of suspended sentence on April 4, 2014 as of the crime of interference with business on April 12, 2014, and committed the instant crime during the period of suspended execution after the judgment became final and conclusive on April 12, 2014, and other unfavorable circumstances such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and all of the sentencing conditions in the instant records, and the scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines (one year to 6 months of imprisonment) cannot be deemed unfair.

Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is not reasonable.