beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.02.12 2015고정1346

재물손괴등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal history] The Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor by larceny, etc. at the Jung-gu District Court on July 31, 2015 and the above judgment became final and conclusive around November 5, 2015.

[Criminal facts] [2015 High Court 1346]

1. On April 28, 2015, the Defendant destroyed the property equivalent to KRW 100,000,00, the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, destroyed the victim E (n, B, and 81)’s entrance door, which was under the influence of alcohol, using the victim E (n, B, and 81)’s glass.

[2016 High Court Decision 120]

2. On April 13, 2015, the Defendant discovered that the Victim F (57, inn) known to the Defendant prior to towing around 16:00 was a bicycle riding in a restaurant only at a restaurant, while the Defendant provided the Victim F (57, inn) with a singing box operated by the Victim F.

On April 13, 2015, the Defendant stolen a bicycle equivalent to KRW 3.5 million at the victim F market price by using 'I' 'H' 305 'H' operated by the victim F in Il-dong-dong-gu G, U.S. at the ancient city around 18:40 on April 13, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

[2015 High Court Decision 1346]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Receipts:

1. Photographs of damaged glass [2016 ancient 120];

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. All on-site photographs;

1. Previous convictions: Application of statutes governing net Internet outputs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines for the crime;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.