Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

1. On August 1, 2014, from around 21:30 to 23:00 of the same day, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) from “E operated by the victim D in the Busan Fambigu, the Defendant: (b) released the beer’s disease on the table of the table without any reason; (c) took the influence of alcohol, and (d) took a bath at a large voice, such as “Chewing baby, human being treated in the same manner as the rice culture, art. 199; and (d) let the victim D display a beer’s disease; and (e) let other customers who were in the said place of business leave the place of the business, such as displaying the beer’s disease.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

2. On August 1, 2014, the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) around 23:15, at the “G’s main point located in the Geum-gu, Busan, where the Defendant received a report that he would escape from the disturbance as referred to in paragraph (1), and the police officer I belonging to the H District of the Busan Geum-gu Police Station, Busan, where the Defendant called out after receiving a report that he had the same disturbance as that of paragraph (1) and heard the case from the victim, the Defendant saw the police officer, who took away from the site of the case without any speech, to take the above main point where the Defendant went away from the site of the case, and then the police officer, who saw the escape, takes the view that he would bring about the above police officer “Chewing typ, D.,” and assault him twice by gathering the beer disease on the table.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each fine, in consideration of the fact that he/she has agreed with the victim of interference with the choice of punishment, that there was no direct physical contact with the police officer, and that there was no record of punishment for obstruction of performance of official duties;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;