However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal history] On April 28, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Incheon District Court, and KRW 2 million as a fine at the Seoul Western District Court on August 4, 2014.

[Criminal facts]

1. On January 7, 2018, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (after-accidents), driving a car in CT-gu at C-gu around 71:45, and driving a car in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul District Court at the 782-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Southern District Court registered the five-lane road in front of the country of registration of the Seoul Southern District Court at the 782-lane, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, changed the course into one way to drive an illegal internship while driving a three-lane away from the airspace of the Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City.

Since there is a place where the center line of yellow solid lines and bus exclusive lanes are installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents, such as thorough operation of the driving service provider and safe driving of the tea.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and went on a bus-only lane due to the negligence that entered a one-lane in order to illegally drive as it is.

D Driving received the front part of the right side of the E-city bus from Defendant driving with the left side of Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant damaged a bus damaged by the above occupational negligence in order to repair it amounting to KRW 2,873,00,000, the Defendant immediately stopped and escaped without taking necessary measures.

2. On January 8, 2018, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol due to a large amount of smelling in the entrance while being investigated at the F Office of the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Police Station located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Seoul as the case referred to in paragraph 1 at around 00:45, and the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol due to a lack of normal conditions.

there are reasonable grounds for suspecting

After being recognized as a slope G for about 10 minutes, the alcohol test was requested four times from about 10 minutes, but it did not comply with it without any justifiable reason.

(i) the evidence;