2. The judgment of the defendant is that the crime of this case is committed by professional workers or re-satisfy, and the victim's re-satisfying the amount of KRW 46 million in total over several times from four victims, which is the majority of the victims and the poor criminal law, the defendant is punished for fraud, the fact that there are several records that the defendant has been punished for fraud, and the damage has not been repaid at all. However, the previous records of punishment are most small fines, and when considering the amount of fraud and all other conditions of sentencing as shown in the records of this case, it cannot be said that the sentence imposed by the court below is too uneasy and unfair.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.