정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
The defendant is innocent.
1. The gist of the facts charged is that the defendant alleged that he was disabled by the medical malpractice of the C Hospital located in Gwangju-do, and the defendant was the child of D who conducted one person demonstration before the above hospital, and the victim E is the person working as the planning director of the above hospital.
The fact that the Defendant removed a banner for demonstration by the victim was merely the victim's removal from the vehicle A, and did not damage the vehicle. The Defendant merely delivered the content that the attorney-at-law of the hospital in intending to find the victim from the victim, who is not the victim, could seize the banner in civil action, and the Defendant was held liable for the portion that the banner was removed. However, the victim was knifeed with the banner in the knife, knife the banner in the vehicle, knife the knife, knife the knife, knife the knife, and knife by actively contact the Defendant's side, and made intimidation as if he was accused and accused.
A. On April 23, 2012, the Defendant, for the purpose of slandering the Victim E, the planning director of the C Hospital, damaged the victim’s reputation by pointing out the false fact that “I will be punished even if I will suffer from a defect in the khon’s vehicle,” pointing out the following false fact that E, the planning director, suffered damage to oneself due to one-person demonstration thickness, and seized and accused the Agin’s property, and the planning director, as I will write down a banner carrying a knife with a thickness of a knife, a knife with a thickness of a knife, the knife’s mother entering and leaving the vehicle, by pointing out the false fact that I will be punished even if Igreged by a defect in the knife’s vehicle.”
B. On April 27, 2012, the Defendant issued the G Assembly member’s free bulletin board with the title “I ambling and present at the H. H hospital,” with the intention of slandering the victim.