Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

1. On December 6, 2013, around 22:30 on December 6, 2013, the Defendant: (a) reported that the victim E (the age of 53), who is the Dozers, Dozers (the age of Dozers) are going against other customers’ singing; and (b) assaulted the victim’s left side at one time without any reason when the victim’s attacked the victim’s singing.

2. The Defendant damaged property damage: (a) at the time and place described in paragraph (1), the victim E’s damage caused damage to approximately KRW 2210,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, such as the victim E’s sound equipment owned by the victim E using microphones on the stage; and (b) the victim’s sound equipment, such as the victim’s live, line weather, table, and mixing; and (c) damage the market price of approximately 30,000,000,000,000 won.

3. The Defendant interfered with the business of interfering with the business of the victim F by destroying things within the Drano shop, such as the date and time set forth in paragraph (1), and at the place set forth in paragraph (2), and by causing customers to play a 20-minute-scam, and preventing customers from entering the store.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement of E and F; 1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (investigation into the submission of victim estimates);

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. On June 5, 2013, the Defendant, with reasons for sentencing under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Busan District Court, and again committed the instant crime even though the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 13, 2013, and is still under the suspension period.

However, the attitude of the defendant to make a confession and to reflect the mistake.