beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.04.26 2015가단14377

손해배상금 등

Text

1. As to Defendant juice Investment Development Co., Ltd.:

(a) Plaintiff A KRW 37,828,454;

B. Plaintiff B: 18,900,590 won, C.

Reasons

1. On March 27, 2014, the basic facts were as follows: (a) each registration of ownership preservation was completed in the future of Defendant New Filling Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “New Filling Construction”); (b) as to No. 107 and No. 108 of the Dayang-si Dayang-si Dayang-si Do, the registration of ownership transfer based on trade on August 27, 2012; and (c) the registration of ownership transfer based on trade on July 27, 2012; and (d) as to No. non-109 on July 30, 2012, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the future of Plaintiff C with respect to No. 110 on July 27, 2014.

(hereinafter referred to as the "instant commercial building" in total). 【Ground for recognition ] A’s evidence 2-1 to 4

2. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. Defendant Hyba is the implementer of Goyangyang-si and commercial building at the time of e-mail, and Defendant ju New Investment Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “△ Investment Development”) is the company that sells the above apartment and commercial building on behalf of others.

The buyer’s purchase price No. 107 Plaintiff A 185,642,273 won and 108 Plaintiff A 192,642,273 won and Plaintiff B 189,005,909 won and Plaintiff C 192,103,00 won

B. On August 27, 2012, the Plaintiffs entered into a sales contract with Defendant New Hyba and completed the registration of ownership transfer after full payment as follows.

C. The Defendants provided false and exaggerated advertisements and explanations with regard to the sale of the instant commercial building. Unlike the drawings, advertisements, and explanations at the time of the sales contract, the actual construction status differs from the following, resulting in enormous property damage to the Plaintiffs:

1) Of the instant commercial buildings, Nos. 108, 109, and 110 were constructed to create a floor drop for each store, unlike the explanation at the time of sale. 2) The first Defendant Hyba was directly managing Bana on the second underground floor. Of Nos. 101, 101, 102, and 103, adjacent to the instant commercial building, were used as a private house, a ticket, and a stop room, and were not sold to the general public. However, in fact, the instant commercial building was not sold to the general public.