beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.03.09 2016가단216277

중개수수료

Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 10,000,000 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from June 24, 2015 to March 9, 2017.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the Plaintiff was a licensed real estate agent operating real estate brokerage business with the trade name “D Licensed Real Estate Agent Office” in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the Defendant concluded a sales contract to sell a building “F” on June 23, 2015 (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant real estate”) with a size of 564.9 square meters of land E located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City and its 8th floor (hereinafter referred to as “the instant real estate purchaser”) for purchase price of KRW 6,950,000 (hereinafter referred to as “instant sales contract”), and there is no counter-proof by the Plaintiff.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay the brokerage commission to the plaintiff who arranged the sales contract of this case, except in extenuating circumstances.

B. We examine the scope of the brokerage commission and the amount of the brokerage commission to be paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff asserts that he agreed to pay a brokerage commission of the sales contract of this case to KRW 68,805,00. Thus, according to the evidence Nos. 3 and 4, the "value of brokerage remuneration and actual expenses" among the specifications for confirmation of the object of brokerage attached to the sales contract of this case (=68,805,000 x value-added 6,25,000 x 0.9% x 0.9% 0.9% x 0.9% 6,255,000 x the brokerage commission) among the specifications for confirmation of the object of brokerage attached to the sales contract of this case and the sales contract of this case, the transaction fee may be imposed separately in accordance with the rate prescribed by City/Do municipal ordinance or in accordance with the rate prescribed by City/Do municipal ordinance. However, the description for confirmation of object of brokerage shall be in accordance with the provisions of Article 25(1) and (3) of the Licensed Real Estate Agents Act and Article 21 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act.