If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On August 22, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by using the gaps in which the victim C, who was aware of the peace in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, had been divingd; and (b) had an amount equivalent to KRW 80,000 at the South-west 1 market price of the victim’s South-west-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order reflects the defendant's wrong recognition of his/her fault, and is still without any history of punishment for the same kind of crime, the damaged goods have been returned to the victim, the circumstances leading to the instant crime, and other factors of sentencing as indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, are considered.