공무집행방해등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On March 6, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 01:20, the Defendant: (b) requested the Defendant, who was on the top of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Gangnam Police Station, who was under the influence of alcohol and was on the street before the Gangnam Police Station, to leave the taxi, and was asked by the police officer on his name in the name of the unclaimed taxi, to leave the taxi; and (c) did not comply with the request.
Accordingly, the above B requested the superintendent of the police station watch keeping duty at the above police station B to assist the defendant, and at the same time, the defendant was aware of the defendant, and the defendant was able to write down the defendant's shoulder and get off the taxi in the above B and C, and the defendant took a bath to the above B and C, and subsequently the defendant was able to bring a disturbance, such as putting the clothes on the road and taking a bath on the road, and thereby, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties, such as the protective measures by assaulting the face of the above C at one time on the floor, and the prevention of crimes and the suppression of detention.
2. At around 03:00 on March 6, 2014, the Defendant damaged the public object by putting the door of the protective detention room into body and placing the locker in the protective detention room at hand while being detained in the protective detention room for the same reason as the preceding paragraph, which was arrested as an flagrant offender on the ground of the preceding paragraph, and thereby damaging that the locker of the protective detention room is a public object used by the above public office, which was removed by putting the protective wall installed on his/her hand, and that the locker, locker, etc. would be worth KRW 385,00,000 at repair cost.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;
1. The prosecutor's statement concerning B;
1. Statement of police statement concerning B and C;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damage, melting articles, photographs, and estimates;
1. Articles 136 (1) and 141 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act are applicable;