beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.03.27 2013고단1531

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] Defendant A, at around 18:10 on August 2, 2013, 2013, had a defect in conversation between Defendant A and the victim D (the age of 57) of the wife in the divorce lawsuit at the F parking lot located in Sinpo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, and had the Defendant obstructed the front of the G Kamenn-si car driven by the Defendant, and had the victim listed above the above vehicle run front and rear the above vehicle, which is a dangerous object for the vehicle to be cut off, and caused the victim to suffer from the body of the vehicle, and caused the victim to suffer injury, such as a cage of cat at least six weeks of treatment for the vehicle.

[2013 Highest 183]

1. Defendant A is a person who is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with D on June 9, 1993. A

On December 25, 2011, around 03:34, the Defendant used the trade name in the upper Dong at Mapo-si, Mapo-si, with B one-time sexual intercourse.

B. On December 31, 201, around 06:03, the Defendant sent the trade name in the Mapo-si, Mapo-si to B with one another, where it is difficult to know the trade name.

C. On January 10, 2012, around 05:06, the Defendant sent to a single sexual intercourse with B at a telecom with which it is difficult to find out the trade name in the upper Dong at Mapo-si. D.

Around 06:03 on January 22, 2012, the Defendant sent to a telecom with B one-time sexual intercourse at a telecom where it is impossible to know the trade name in the upper Dong at Sinpo-si.

E. Around April 13, 2012, the Defendant, who was sexual intercourse with B and one time at the Mosel where it is difficult to know the trade name in the upper Dong-si.

2. Defendant B knew that he was a spouse of the above A, the Defendant had sexual intercourses with A and five times at each time, place, and place described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

[2013 Highest 1531]

1. Part of the statement made by the defendant A in the first trial record;

1. Each police statement concerning D;

1. A medical certificate [2013 Highest 183];

1. The Defendants’ respective statements in the first protocol of trial

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Marriage relation certificate and reception certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

A. Defendant A: Articles 3(1) and 2(1)3(3) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act