except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 2, 2009, the Defendant, at the Gwangju District Court, issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and at the same court on November 19, 2010, notified each of the summary order of KRW 5 million due to the same crime. On May 8, 2014, at around 00:45, the Defendant driven a B rocketing car under the influence of under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 200 meters from the front of a cafeteria of the trade name, “Manari” located in the U.S.ridong-gu, Gwangju District Court to the front day of the Kanri-gu, Gwangju District Court to 00 meters away from the cafeteria, to the front day of the Kanri-marbbbbbb bus oma.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes entered in criminal records;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do354, Apr. 1,

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the absence of previous convictions who have been sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment);