A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for four months, respectively.

(2) the date of this judgment.

1. Defendant A’s joint crime committed by the Defendants is a person who operates an entertainment center in the name of “E” from March 1, 2017 to Incheon Gyeyang-gu D and 5, and Defendant B is a person employed by Defendant A from around the above day to work as the head of the said establishment.

The Defendants, along with F and G, as an employee at the above-day border, and Defendant A, as an employer, planned to arrange sexual traffic to allow employees G, etc. to take charge of the overall management of the above business establishment, and to induce male customers to the above business establishment. Defendant B, as an employee manager, takes charge of explaining the method of sexual traffic against the customers who find a business establishment in addition to the management of the employee as an employee, and F, as an employee, is in charge of ice as an employee, and G, as an employee (hereinafter “the date from the date of the business establishment”), to take charge of attracting male customers to the above business establishment, and to arrange sexual traffic to allow many unspecified male customers who find the above business establishment to take charge of sexual intercourse and sexual intercourse.

In collusion with F and G, at around 22:30 on October 14, 2017, the Defendants, as seen above, can engage in sexual intercourse in a room installed in the bedroom where “if the Defendants wish to engage in an additional 110,000 won, including alcohol, internal unlimited, and non-permanent services (similar teaching) at KRW 150,00,00 for 10,000, the Defendants paid KRW 110,00,000 to 10,000.

“The purpose of this study is to explain that “the sexual traffic” is to arrange sexual traffic in a manner that receives 300,000 won in total as the price for sexual traffic for each woman employee, after bringing J and K into the room No. 2 above, and then receives 150,000 won in total.

2. No business operator prescribed by Presidential Decree, such as a food service provider, etc. in violation of the Food Sanitation Act of Defendant A, and his/her employees shall attract customers for the purpose of maintaining business hygiene and order, and promoting public health and sanitation;

Nevertheless, the defendant on January 9, 2017.