beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2016.06.09 2015고단456

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant: (a) the operator of “C”, the victim D, the c, the c, the c, the c, the c, the c, and the c, the c, the c, the c, the c, the c, the c, the c, and the c, the c, the c, the c, the c, the c, the c, the c, the c, the c, the c, the c, the c, the c, the c, the c

On November 2014, the Defendant entered into an agreement with the Defendant on the instant “C” office located in Syang-si, G around 2014, with the Defendant’s “F, a yellow chickens farmer,” and the Defendant’s “F, a yellow chickens.”

E designated E as a branch office in the area of Honam, and said, “The 50 million won difference under the name of the master plan to continuously supply the yellow chickens in the area of Honam, while having the exclusive power to sell the Francccck in the area of Honam.”

However, at the time, the Defendant did not enter into a contract for supply as well as the general sales contract. Therefore, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to designate the victim as a branch office in the south area or to give the victim an exclusive right to sell the victims, or to provide the victims with the yellow chickens continuously.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim as above; (b) obtained a total of KRW 10 million from the victim on December 4, 2014; and (c) KRW 50 million on December 12, 2014; and (d) obtained the money from the Agricultural Cooperative under H’s name as a part of the printing rights.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (report on the contents of telephone communications by witnesses);

1. It is recognized that Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to criminal facts, Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, the defendant's reason for sentencing a sentence of imprisonment is divided into his fault, and the defendant's deposit some of the money for the victim.

However, the crime of this case is not good, and the amount of damage is not so much, but the damage has not yet been repaid or agreed.