However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. A special intimidation: (a) around 14:00 on January 4, 2016, the Defendant prepared 2-liter of gasoline 1 disease, 2-liter of 2-liter of 1 disease, 1 disease, and 3-liter of 2-liter of 2-liter of 2-liter of 1,00, and found to be D in Yongcheon-si, Youngcheon-si; (b) there is a complaint that the supply area of E, one’s wife of which is the delivery source, has been changed; and (c) the above gasoline, etc. has been distributed to the victim F (42 years of her body) who is the head of the place, and the victim F (the victim of 42 years of her body) who is the delivery source. Here, the Defendant

Here, the victim threatened the victim, as the victim was in the above business place.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous goods ‘the victim' and threatened the victim.

2. Defendant 1 violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (person who was involved in the crime) was at the time and place set forth in the above paragraph 1, and after the above crime, the persons who had been involved in the crime were pushed the Defendant.

The Defendant purchased gasoline equivalent to KRW 2,00 from G gas stations located in G gas stations in around 14:20 on the same day in order to threaten the victims by putting the gasoline in his body and fluoring it in his body, and fluorcing it in his fluorcties as follows:

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous objects that are likely to be used for crime due to the lack of justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Statement in the police statement with F and H;

1. The list of seizure and the record of seizure, the investigation report (the suspect's criminal investigation and attachment of photographs), the test, analysis and reply, respectively;

1. The defendant asserts to the effect that the video recorded in CDs (the defendant did not have the criminal intent of intimidation at the time of the instant case, and did not correspond to D with a gasoline for the purpose of committing a crime.

The following circumstances, i.e., the victim under investigation conducted by the police, and around 13:00 on January 4, 2016.