특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On July 30, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1 million on July 30, 2010 to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving), and a fine of KRW 4 million on July 28, 2014 by the same court on July 28, 2014, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4 million on two occasions.
1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle in the CNA Scoo coo-si in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, the violation of the Road Traffic Act (unnecessary Measures after Accidents), and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving).
On February 15:32, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car without obtaining a driver's license of the said car, and turned the two lanes in front of the E, which are in D at the time of the game, into one-lane in front of the training area from the inside of the inside side of the road, and changed the course.
Since this is a bend road, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance and to change the course safely by accurately manipulating the steering direction and device in advance after informing the person engaged in driving a motor vehicle that he/she would change the course by reducing speed in advance and using a direction direction, etc., and taking into account well before and after the end.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this, while driving on a bend road, was negligent in changing the course to the right side of the Defendant’s car, and the part on the left side of the Victim F (23 Do) driving, which was proceeding two lanes due to the negligence of changing the course to the right side of the Defendant’s car.
As a result, Defendant 1 suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. of the bones that requires approximately two weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence, and at the same time, Defendant 1 driven the franchising without taking necessary measures, such as destroying the franchising car and providing relief to the damaged party, even though the 640,118 won of the repair cost, such as exchange of soft fences, etc.
2. On February 4, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of alcohol measurement) at the time of competition.