The Defendant is the victim D Co., Ltd. with the second floor of the building in Sung-nam City from August 3, 2009 to July 25, 2013 and the head of the business division works for the victim D Co., Ltd. and engaged in golf product agency management and the collection business.

around August 14, 2009, the Defendant sold the said company’s golf appliances to the “G” operated by the F in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, and collected KRW 3,074,922 for the said company’s business, and used the said company’s golf appliances for personal purposes, such as repayment of debts, at around that time.

In addition, from around that time to July 19, 2013, the Defendant sold a total of 35 golf equipment agency amounting to KRW 132,103,114 of the said company’s golf equipment, as indicated in the attached list of crimes, and collected KRW 122,982,134 of the said company’s golf equipment, and embezzled it by consuming it without depositing it to the said company’s account or accounting officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the embezzlement interest list and claims investigation statement;

1. In light of the relevant legal provisions on criminal facts and the fact that the reasons for sentencing under Articles 356 and 355(1) of the Criminal Act for the selection of punishment for the crime of this case have not been sufficiently restored to the extent that the damage caused by the crime of this case has not been recovered, a strict punishment for the defendant is required.

However, the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of the fact that the defendant is against the mistake, the fact that there is no record of the same kind of crime, the circumstances of the crime in this case, the age, character and conduct of the defendant, the environment, etc.