However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 16, 2017, the Defendant accessed the victim D (24 tax) who was frighting to drink and alcohol in front of the "C" store located in the Manyang-gu B, Annyang-si, Annyang-si on September 16, 2017 and was frighting to “hakhh”.

“In the end, the victim galked “no longer fluort” and galed “no fluort fluort fluort,” the victim galddddd and galddddddddd, and caused bodily injury, such as an inner fluoral fluor, which requires treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including observation of protection and community service order;

1. Scope of recommended punishment on the sentencing guidelines: Imprisonment with prison labor for up to one year and six months (the scope of recommended punishment); the basic area (from April to one year and six months) of the types of general bodily injury (the scope of recommended punishment); and

2. Determination of sentence: Suspension of execution for six months in prison - Circumstances favorable to him/her: The fact that he/she reflects mistake; unfavorable circumstances: The fact that there is no agreement with the victim and that he/she has been punished several times for violent crimes;