On March 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 14:58 on March 19, 2015, at the time of the East Sea, claimed that the mobile phone terminal was inferior and demanded refund; and (b) during the call, the Defendant damaged the victim’s property by breaking up the table glass equivalent to KRW 30,000, the market price of the victim’s possession, which is the victim’s possession of the mobile phone, was boomed with the loss of the mobile phone, and boomed with the defect.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on photographs of damaged glass;

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Penalty fine of 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons above Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence;